diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'ASimpleReply')
| -rw-r--r-- | ASimpleReply/ASimpleReply2.md | 6 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | ASimpleReply/ASimpleReply3.md | 2 |
2 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/ASimpleReply/ASimpleReply2.md b/ASimpleReply/ASimpleReply2.md index 45017b61..366462bc 100644 --- a/ASimpleReply/ASimpleReply2.md +++ b/ASimpleReply/ASimpleReply2.md @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ maintains type info end-to-end, because its free to do so and because its useful. "Equivalence classes are much weaker for arrays" - sure. And basically make no -differece to 99% of all Java programs. 1-d arrays vectorize just fine; stencil +difference to 99% of all Java programs. 1-d arrays vectorize just fine; stencil calculations also fine. Register blocking and tiling? First Java needs to change how multi-D arrays are laid out then we can worry about loop carried aliasing. Basically, Java was never intended to replace Fortran, although in @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ optimize some things around the call - all dwarfed by the call overhead itself. "Memory optimizations also cannot typically float past deoptimization state" - plenty of those in Java too. C2 also does not sink stores *below* a deopt state. At least for Java, we can float loads *up* past a deopt state (and do -so plenty). +so plenty). Also, call inline points *completely* disappear in C2. There is no optimization barrier after inlining, even for memory effects. This is @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ alias, the other aliases are not even representable". This gets into a weak argument from me about how after specialization guards, we're back to equivalence classes... but I honestly dunno. Not tried it in JS -at least (C2 certainly does this, but its not so common as JS). +at least (C2 certainly does this, but its not so common as JS). Very curious though... Curious enough for Google to fund a reprise with me lending a hand? diff --git a/ASimpleReply/ASimpleReply3.md b/ASimpleReply/ASimpleReply3.md index 395f4b77..a432e239 100644 --- a/ASimpleReply/ASimpleReply3.md +++ b/ASimpleReply/ASimpleReply3.md @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ Dadal: In a similar situation C2 will do the same. Of course, for sufficiently hot `foo` and modest `bar`, inlining is the answer. This makes me wonder if C2's -inlininhg budget is substantially higher than V8's. +inlining budget is substantially higher than V8's. Dadal: > "Oh, and `bar` could be changing the shape of `o` only some times" |